Everbright Securities Oolong case referred to the first instance of the appeal was dismissed, senten-7470d

Everbright Securities Oolong refers to the case of first instance Panpei two appeal dismissed the plaintiff 33 thousand and 800 yuan Sina Level2:A shares of sina finance client speed Kanpan: the most profitable investors are in use for Everbright Securities Oolong means incident, Shanghai court has accepted the more than 100 related civil and commercial cases. The evening of February 16th, Everbright Securities announced that the company received the Shanghai Municipal Higher People’s Court on the compensation dispute 8.16 incident civil cases of second instance verdict, upheld the verdict, Everbright Securities Chen Wei, Zhang Xiaojie is sentenced to compensate for the loss of 2 people totaling 33824 yuan. In September 30, 2015, the Shanghai second intermediate people’s court Chen Wei, Zhang Xiaojie 2 people were sued Everbright Securities Limited by Share Ltd to "compensation dispute 816 incident civil case to the company delivered a verdict, the verdict that Everbright Securities Compensation Chen Wei, Zhang Xiaojie 2 people lost a total of 33824 yuan. Everbright Securities appealed to the higher people’s Court of Shanghai in accordance with the law in accordance with the above two cases. In February 16, 2016, the Shanghai Municipal Higher People’s Court of the above two cases delivered to the company the two trial, two trial rejected the company’s appeal, upheld the verdict. Since the end of September 2015 to early December, the Shanghai second intermediate people’s court has 51 people such as Zhang Xiaojie were sued Everbright Securities involving "compensation dispute 8.16 incident" civil case have conducted 3 referees, one trial of 31 cases of total never sentenced the company lost 1 million 289 thousand and 400 yuan compensation for the plaintiff. It is reported that, since December 2013, Shanghai second intermediate hospital accepted "Everbright Oolong finger" 497 cases, has concluded 118 pieces. Up to now, a total of 74 cases of the first instance judgment, Everbright Securities Compensation plaintiff losses totaling 5 million 743 thousand and 200 yuan. The so-called "8.16 event" occurred in August 16, 2013, and was called "Everbright Securities Oolong event" by the media". On the same day, the stock index opened lower at 2075, and the stock index hovered at a low level before 11. 11 points to 5 points, multi heavyweight huge pay, after a large number of heavyweights are one or two big moment pulled up, there are a large number of huge pay following the emergence, driven by the stock and other stocks rose overall, so that as many as 59 stocks closed limit moment. 11:15 onwards, the stock index began to pull second waves, the highest rise to 2198 points, noon to close at 2149 points. At 13 p.m., Everbright Securities announced that due to important matters not announced, temporary suspension. Around 14:23, Everbright Securities issued a notice, admit arbitrage system problems, said the company is carrying out relevant verification and disposal work. China Securities Regulatory Commission at the meeting held later said that the stock index rose 5.96% instantly, mainly due to the Everbright Securities self account large purchase. The day 13 points after opening, Everbright Securities in undisclosed circumstances by selling stock index futures to hedge risk, selling ETF, 13:22 announcement said the company’s strategy to invest in the use of proprietary business problems when the independent arbitrage system. On November 2013, the China Securities Regulatory Commission issued

光大证券乌龙指案一审上诉被驳回 判赔两原告3.38万元 新浪财经Level2:A股极速看盘 新浪财经客户端:最赚钱的投资者都在用   因光大证券“乌龙指”事件,上海法院迄今已经受理了相关的100多件民商事案件。   2月16日晚间,光大证券公告称,公司收到上海市高级人民法院就“8.16事件”民事赔偿纠纷案的二审判决,二审维持一审判决,光大证券被判赔偿陈巍、张晓捷2人损失共计人民币33824元。   2015年9月30日,上海市第二中级人民法院就陈巍、张晓捷2人分别起诉光大证券股份有限公司涉及“816事件”民事赔偿纠纷案向公司送达了一审判决,一审判决令光大证券赔偿陈巍、张晓捷2人损失共计人民币33824元。   光大证券就上述两起案件依法向上海市高级人民法院提起上诉。2016年2月16日,上海市高级人民法院对上述两起案件向公司送达了二审判决,二审判决驳回了公司的上诉请求,维持一审判决。   自2015年9月底至12月初,上海市二中院已就张晓捷等51人分别起诉光大证券涉及“8.16事件”民事赔偿纠纷案陆续进行了3次裁判,其中31起案件的一审判决共计判公司赔偿原告损失128.94万元。   据悉,自2013年12月至今,上海二中院共受理“光大乌龙指”案497件,已审结118件。截至目前,共计有74起案件的一审判决光大证券赔偿原告损失合计574.32万元。   所谓的“8.16事件”因发生在2013年8月16日,而被媒体称为“光大证券乌龙指事件”。   当天,沪指以2075点低开,11点前股指均于低位徘徊。11点5分,多只权重股出现巨额买单,大批权重股被一两个大单瞬间拉升之后,又有大批巨额买单跟随涌现,带动股指与其它股票整体上涨,以致多达59只权重股瞬间封涨停。11点15分起,沪指开始第二波拉升,最高涨至2198点,午间收报2149点。   下午13点,光大证券公告称因重要事项未公告,临时停牌。14点23分左右,光大证券发布公告,承认套利系统出现问题,称公司正在进行相关核查和处置工作。中国证监会在随后召开的通气会上表示,沪指瞬间上涨5.96%,主要原因是光大证券自营账户大额买入。   当日13点开市后,光大证券在未披露的情况下通过卖空股指期货、卖出ETF对冲风险,至13点22分才公告称公司策略投资自营业务在使用其独立套利系统时出现问题。   2013年11月,中国证监会发布行政处罚,认定光大证券违规进行内幕交易。对杨剑波在内的四名责任人作出行政处罚决定及市场禁入决定。 进入【新浪财经股吧】讨论相关的主题文章: